The “Red-Green Alliance” of woke neo-Marxism and radical Islamism hates the State of Israel and Jewish endeavour.

Following the clashes between police and demonstrators in central Porto on 15 October, sparked by a protest encampment demanding the right to housing, public debate focused primarily on head injuries and the cost of living. The presence of flags and messages hostile to the Jewish state went virtually undiscussed. This silence is strange.

On 30 January 2024, during a similar demonstration in Porto, numerous placards were displayed targeting Israeli landlords and property investors in the city. The messages left no room for doubt: “Neither Israeli landlords nor vulture funds”, “Neither Haifa nor Boavista”, and “Neither deaths in Gaza nor evictions in Porto”. The following day, the website Esquerda.net even dared to publish the actual names of those targeted and their companies, contaminating the country with something not seen in any nation since the era of Nazism—or, more precisely, National Socialism.

The Jewish Community of Porto (CIP/CJP), as was its duty, filed a criminal complaint with the notorious Portuguese Prosecutor General's Office (PGR) for discrimination and incitement to hatred and violence, given that Boavista is the area of the city where the country's largest and most active synagogue is located, and the demonstrators' targets had been described as “murderous Zionists”. The PGR did what was expected of it: it closed the investigation without carrying out a single investigative measure.

Thriving across much of Europe, the “Red-Green Alliance” of woke neo-Marxism and radical Islamism—represented by sectors of the progressive political left (the “red”) and movements of political or radical Islamism (the “green”)—hates the State of Israel and Jewish endeavour. It tends to institutionalise its causes through officials who behave as though they share the same clothes, stories, casual conversations and lunch tables.

Always highly active in protecting and expanding the rights of racial, sexual and gender minorities, as well as—and above all—the oligarchs of the system, the institution responsible for coordinating and overseeing the Public Prosecution Service and safeguarding democratic legality has demonstrated, year after year, that Jews do not count. Quite the opposite.

On 9 June 2025, the international press reported an attempted poisoning of Israelis at the Boom Festival in Portugal. A year and a half has passed. Spectacular judicial action: zero. Accountability established: zero. Woke justice has maintained the pattern to which everyone has become accustomed, contributing to a country without hope through its inertia, bias and, moreover—a subject rarely discussed—the corrupt “fight against corruption”, generally used selectively to persecute and delegitimise ideological opponents.

On 28 November 2022, young Jews from Porto submitted a proposal to Parliament drawing attention to a strange coordination of political, media and judicial power against the city's Jewish community. The following day, the petition's first signatory, Ilan Cohen, the leader of the city's Jewish study centre, was the target of an attempt on his life, which he immediately reported to the authorities. The resulting criminal investigation was closed without a single investigative measure being carried out—not even questioning the complainant.

Months earlier, on 29 March, the former president of SIRESP had her home broken into during the early hours of the morning, and her computers were stolen. She had been dismissed by the government days earlier over alleged links to a company belonging to a wealthy Jew. Nothing further was heard about the investigation. There are ample reasons to believe that it, too, was simply closed.

On 11 January 2022, a handful of figures from the judicial establishment, who had previously dared to open eight criminal investigations against Judge Ivo Rosa, decided to go further by opening an investigation against the Jewish Community of Porto, without identifying any facts or indicating who, how, where, when or what. How easy it is to claim, in the abstract, that others engage in trafficking and corrupt registry offices! Eight months later, on 28 September, the Lisbon Court of Appeal reduced that investigation to “nothing” and raised the question: “How can anyone defend themselves against generalities?”28.de

A synagogue and a Jewish museum were raided on the orders of the Public Prosecution Service. The intention of woke justice was to serve the system's “Palestinian cause”. It set about seizing everything it could lay its hands on—as during the Inquisition—so that it could spend years exploiting the proceeds of the seizure and searching for any possible grounds to smear people, in partnership with journalist friends. But let us look at the even more spectacular beginning of this story, which certainly deserves to be made into a film one day.

On 6 December 2021, Professor Rui Pereira fundamentally challenged the constitutionality of the Socialist government's draft decree-law intended to hollow out and destroy a law. On 18 December 2021, an unexpected and conveniently timed “news report” falsely linked a “Russian oligarch” to donations to the Holocaust Museum. On 23 December 2021, the government approved the unconstitutional decree. On 28 December 2021, the government forwarded that “news report” to the PGR so that it could open a criminal “investigation” against the CIP/CJP. Separation of powers at its finest, as we can see!

The investigation was opened without any factual basis on 11 January. The following day, 12 January, a female lawyer representing the Community had her office broken into in the early hours of the morning by mysterious professionals, who stole the server. A criminal complaint was filed. The result: another investigation closed at lightning speed, without any investigative measures whatsoever—not even questioning the complainant.

One can easily imagine how Jewish communities were destroyed before Israel existed. In 2022, every available means was employed to bring down a private organisation. Even the war in Ukraine was used; indeed, it provided the backdrop. Politicians and journalists roared with laughter at the invented name “Abramovich da Silva, ha, ha”, without even knowing what a Jew is—an ignorance they democratically maintain—while grappling with Mr “Abel Benjamin Rocha da Leiva Leja Rosa Paya Abramovich”, whose family origins were attested by Chabad Lubavitch.

The problem concerning the individual targeted, who is the grandson, son and father of Lithuanian citizens, begins with his very surname, which appears on the list of Sephardic surnames in the Jewish community of Zamość in 1580 (Dr N. M. Gelber, History of the Sephardim in Poland, in Otzar Yehudi Sepharad, Vol. VI, Jerusalem, 1963). It should be recalled that family names and family memory were illustrative legal criteria to be taken into account, first by the Community, second by the Registry Office, and third by the government, which “could” grant nationality—or refuse it.

In recent months, it fell to the organisation that is a world leader in the promotion of Jewish culture (and which sectors of the cartelised press described as “opulent”) to publish a book on Amazon entitled “The Abramovich Case: Who Tried to Kill the Young French Jewish Leader Ilan Cohen?” LINK, so that the entire establishment can no longer feel free to spit on a “Yid” again without provoking worldwide debate. The book was kindly presented by the Community to the governments of the thirty nations most closely aligned in the defence of Israel and the Jews, as well as to every political party in the Knesset.LINK

There is no conscientious person in the country of King Afonso Henriques and Yaish ben Yahia who would claim that the “Red-Green Alliance” would like to see Portugal home to large numbers of Jews, still less prosperous ones. The immigration it seeks is from the Third World, with voting rights and access to social welfare programmes—precisely the immigration that is setting Europe ablaze. The legislation concerning Jews of Portuguese origin had to be brought to an end, by fair means or foul. That story, however, is not over.

The Jewish Community of Porto has already informed the PGR that it will publish a book on Amazon about every potential “suspect” who may be identified in the material seized—and there should, in fact, be many, very many, given that the alleged objective was to dismantle an “Open Door”. We shall see. All the other slanders once disseminated on a massive scale in Portugal are already on Amazon, one by one, book by book, all documented. This is not merely a matter of transparency, but of history. The Jews, a minority, fight their battles in history, not amid the noise of the public stage, against thousands of sharp tongues and a great deal of suicidal thoughtlessness.

It will also fall to the Israeli Ministry of Justice, in due course, to determine whether and how the country's criminal law should be applied to individuals acting in concert across all branches of power who may have participated in some way in the “Palestinian Question” that unfolded so ruthlessly in Portugal, with the aim of destroying not only a law but also the strongest Jewish community. Meanwhile, the Asian Jew who had once been willing to assist with everything concerning the Continental Shelf, including through diplomatic channels and by providing expertise in China and India, withdrew, saying: “They are poor and ungrateful! Good luck.”

In summary, “Neither Haifa nor Boavista” is not merely the slogan of demonstrators demanding better housing. It also expresses the values of the “Red-Green Alliance”, which for years steered the destiny of the Portuguese nation and fiercely attacked the Jewish world, showing no concern for appearances when it came to the separation of powers and basic procedural rules in the twenty-first century, let alone the interests of the country and the “cost of living” now so loudly denounced by thousands of individuals with purple hair, nose piercings, bodies covered in tattoos and arms raised high, waving the flags of the Hamas state—a perfect image of anarchic tribalism, utterly ignorant of what Sharia is, and where it is heading.